Five Minute Skill Building

A recent article in the Reader’s Digest indicated that some students graduating from college are unable to read letters, journals, or other papers written by their own parents because they were never taught how to write cursive after the third grade.  They are going to have a difficult time reading any original historical documents prior to 1900.  How about you?  Have you been taught these important essential paleography skills?

Were you taught about common given name abbreviations such as those below when you were in grade school?  Most of these are super-scripted samples where the first letter or so was written then the last letter in the word was written above the line (like a footnote entry if typed).   Finally see if you can recognize the words written in script on the left.  Sample given names

  • James = Ja[me]s.
  • Thomas = Tho[ma]s.
  • William = W[illia]m.
  • John = J[oh]n.
  • Nathaniel = Nath[anie]l.
  • Christopher = X[Christo]pher.
  • Henry = Hy.
  • George = Geo.
  • Joseph = Jos.
  • Robert = Robt.
  • Charles = Chas.
  • Alexander = Alexr.
  • Jonathan = Jno.

See above, which letters have been left out by noting the letters in bracket.  Then see if you can fill in the missing letters on those given names with no brackets.

How do you explain to others that names are often spelled different ways? Spelling was generally okay, but if the writer didn’t know how to spell a name, he would write it phonetically (the way he heard it spoken).  Names weren’t too different then as they are now.  If it looks like “Harreol” it’s possibly “Harriet”.  Some names can be confused for each other depending on the handwriting of the record-keeper, such as David and Daniel, Samuel and Lemuel, or the abbreviations Jas. [James] and Jos. [Joseph or Josiah].

Some names had various alternate, accepted spellings, such as Ester, Esther, Easter, and Hester.  They were called name variants.  This is true as well with Mary and Polly, Sarah and Sally, Fate and Lafayette.

“Mc” names could be written several different ways as well and yet all mean the same surname or family: McLaughlin, MLaughlin, M’Laughlin

Writers in the 1800s and earlier used a crook s if a word had a double s (on the first s).  The crook s (named because it looks like a shepherd’s crook or staff) often looks like “fs” or “p” to a modern reader.  The name Jesse would therefore be erroneously transcribed as Jefse or Jepe.  Bass could look like Bafs or Bap.

Were you warned about abbreviations in old documents.  For example, Do or a symbol  indicated a ditto, meaning to use the same word above the line such as this paragraph from a probate estate:

1 note on James Smith [transcribed it means 1 note on James Smith]
1 Do on Phillip Brown [means 1 note on Phillip Brown]
1 Do on Do Smith [means 1 note on Phillip Smith]
NOTE: The word “note” means either a receipt or an invoice that looks like a small piece of paper called an “IOU” that was as good as a check.

If the above seems incredible to you, consider this item compliments of the North Carolina Collection, University of North Carolina Library, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1987:

Willard M. Wallace, in his Sir Walter Raleigh (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959), pp. 319-320, counted more than seventy contemporary spellings of the courtier’s name: Raleigh, Ralegh, Rawley, Raweley, Raulie, Rawlegh, Rawleigh, Rawleighe, Raleghe, Rawlye, Rawleie, Rawligh, Raileigh, Raughlie, Rauleigh, Raleighe, Raylie, Raghley, Raghlie, Rawleygh, Rawleyghe, Rawely, Rauly, Raughley, Raughly, Raylye, Rolye, Rolle, Raughleigh, Raleikk, Rale, Real, Reali, Ralego, Rahlegh, Raley, Raleye, Raleagh, Raleygh, Raleyghe, Ralli, Raughleye, Rauleghe, Raulghe, Raweleigh, Raylygh, Reigley, Rhaleigh, Rhaly, Wrawly, Wrawley, Raleighch, Ralo, Ralle, Halley, Raulaeus, and Raleghus.  The Spanish often used his first name–Gualtero, Guatteral, or Gualteral.  To King James he was Raleigh and Raulie; to Henry Howard, Ralegh and Rawlie; to Cecil, Raleigh, Relaegh and Rawley, and to his wife he was usually Ralegh but on at least one occasion Raleigh.  Sir Walter himself used three spellings in a single deed dated 1578–Rawleyghe, Rawlygh, and Ralegh.  In later life he preferred Ralegh.

The next time someone tells you they are only searching for the “real” spelling of their surname, you can share the above story.  If they won’t listen, time has a way of forcing the issue when they can no longer go back in time because the name has stumped them.

Posted in Skill Building | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

RootsTech was Great!

I returned from RootsTech Saturday night a week ago.  As I watched the opening ceremonies on Saturday morning, I really hated for it to end.  Not only because I would have to follow the keynote speakers, but it was just a great conference.  David Pogue, the New York Times Technology columnist, and founder of the “Missing Manual” books I own, was so entertaining as well as knowledgeable about technology.  I attended another class he taught that was not televised, and enjoyed it even more.

Please do yourselves a favor and click on the link which follows and select the Saturday presentations.  RootsTech is still online for awhile so you can listen not only to David’s presentation but a great announcement regarding MyHeritage.com.  The President of MyHeritage.com received word his father had died and he had to get on a plane and head back to his family.  How would you like to be called up and asked to speak to 5,000 people about a genealogy program you use. Well the man who did it was very good. The company is based in Israel and has been working its way through many countries and launched a big advertising campaign in America.  MyHeritage.com is now the 2nd largest genealogy database company in the industry with Ancestry.com being the first.

I have used it for 5 months on one of my Finland lines, and I am getting hits to living relatives there even though I only put one person in my database at that site.  I’ve traced my lines back to 1625 there and while I am not saying I have Jewish roots (that I know of), it would be great if I did.  I just think this is a company worth watching because of their new innovations.  While just like ancestry, it links you to people who are found in documents, it also goes out and searches for people while you sleep who are also linked to the key person thus doing associates searching at the same time.  I can hardly wait to find time to work with it more.

What did you think about the Conference?  Love to hear from you.

Karen

Posted in RootsTech | Leave a comment

It was easy as falling off a blog

karen clifford avatarI finally did it! I learned how to set up a blog with the help of BlueHost and my husband (who comes up with clever titles). I am learning how to use the WordPress program and its themes which are templates for entering everything.  It came free with my new BlueHost account. As I learn where everything is to be placed this site will be more functional.  Please let me know if you have any suggestions!  I have been recording my progress with preparing two different Web sites so I can share my experience with my students.  You can see what I learned under the “Professional Genealogists” tab above.  To go to the karenclifford.com site, click the image above.

Posted in Blog Use | Tagged , | 3 Comments